Holding that every time a person commits the crime of Article 10, he should be considered as the "last" time he committed the crime and was sent to observation, confinement or coercion. Judgment will be made on whether the time after the completion of the rehabilitation is more than 3 years , otherwise it will violate the legal procedures. C said: The Criminal
Division No. 7, who sent the ruling to the bulk sms service Grand Court this time, believes that there is a third opinion, basically the same as B said, but believes that the three-year period should be counted from the "time of the crime" , not from the "observation of the law". The reckoning begins only after the completion of the abstinence or compulsory rehabilitation. It is precisely because in the past that practical opinions have been based on the first statement and have been implemented accordingly for many years, but this year's different opinions have caused the lower-level prosecutors' offices and courts to be at a loss. The opinion of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office is that B's statement is more in line with the literal interpretation and more appropriate. Experts and scholars:
Drug addiction is a chronic disease like diabetes However, the two experts and scholars believe that whether it is three years after the current law or five years after the old law, it doesn't really make much sense, because drug addiction is not likely to quit once it is said to be quitting, even if it returns after receiving compulsory rehabilitation In the original life, "it is strange that you will stop smoking". In fact, if the addict can gradually reduce the amount of use, it is already a successful addiction treatment. Professor Xu Fusheng believes that although the possibility of decriminalizing drug use is not high according to the